The dosimetric parameters impact on local recurrence in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases (BM) allows very good local control (LC). However, approximately 20%-30% of these lesions will recur. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of dosimetric parameters on LC in cerebral SRT. METHODS: Patients treated with SRT for 1-3 BM between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. A total of 349 patients with 538 lesions were included. The median gross tumour volume (GTV) was 2 cm3 (IQR, 0-7). The median biological effective dose with α/ß = 10 (BED10) was 60 Gy (IQR, 32-82). The median prescription isodose was 71% (IQR, 70-80). Correlations with LC were examined using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 55 months (min-max, 7-85). Median overall survival was 17.8 months (IQR, 15.2-21.9). There were 95 recurrences and LC at 1 and 2 years was 87.1% (95% CI, 84-90) and 78.1% (95% CI, 73.9-82.4), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that systemic treatment, dose to 2% and 50% of the planning target volume (PTV), BED10 > 50 Gy, and low PTV and GTV volume were significantly correlated with better LC. In the multivariate analysis, GTV volume, isodose, and BED10 were significantly associated with LC. CONCLUSION: These results show the importance of a BED10 > 50 Gy associated with a prescription isodose <80% to optimize LC during SRT for BM. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Isodose, BED, and GTV volume were significantly associated with LC. A low isodose improves LC without increasing the risk of radionecrosis.

Computed tomography synthesis from magnetic resonance imaging using cycle Generative Adversarial Networks with multicenter learning.

Background and Purpose: Addressing the need for accurate dose calculation in MRI-only radiotherapy, the generation of synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) from MRI has emerged. Deep learning (DL) techniques, have shown promising results in achieving high sCT accuracies. However, existing sCT synthesis methods are often center-specific, posing a challenge to their generalizability. To overcome this limitation, recent studies have proposed approaches, such as multicenter training . Material and methods: The purpose of this work was to propose a multicenter sCT synthesis by DL, using a 2D cycle-GAN on 128 prostate cancer patients, from four different centers. Four cases were compared: monocenter cases, monocenter training and test on another center, multicenter trainings and a test on a center not included in the training and multicenter trainings with an included center in the test. Trainings were performed using 20 patients. sCT accuracy evaluation was performed using Mean Absolute Error, Mean Error and Peak-Signal-to-Noise-Ratio. Dose accuracy was assessed with gamma index and Dose Volume Histogram comparison. Results: Qualitative, quantitative and dose results show that the accuracy of sCTs for monocenter trainings and multicenter trainings using a seen center in the test did not differ significantly. However, when the test involved an unseen center, the sCT quality was inferior. Conclusions: The aim of this work was to propose generalizable multicenter training for MR-to-CT synthesis. It was shown that only a few data from one center included in the training cohort allows sCT accuracy equivalent to a monocenter study.

A deep learning model to generate synthetic CT for prostate MR-only radiotherapy dose planning: a multicenter study.

Introduction: For radiotherapy based solely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), generating synthetic computed tomography scans (sCT) from MRI is essential for dose calculation. The use of deep learning (DL) methods to generate sCT from MRI has shown encouraging results if the MRI images used for training the deep learning network and the MRI images for sCT generation come from the same MRI device. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate a generic DL model capable of generating sCTs from various MRI devices for prostate radiotherapy. Materials and methods: In total, 90 patients from three centers (30 CT-MR prostate pairs/center) underwent treatment using volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) (60 Gy in 20 fractions). T2 MRI images were acquired in addition to computed tomography (CT) images for treatment planning. The DL model was a 2D supervised conditional generative adversarial network (Pix2Pix). Patient images underwent preprocessing steps, including nonrigid registration. Seven different supervised models were trained, incorporating patients from one, two, or three centers. Each model was trained on 24 CT-MR prostate pairs. A generic model was trained using patients from all three centers. To compare sCT and CT, the mean absolute error in Hounsfield units was calculated for the entire pelvis, prostate, bladder, rectum, and bones. For dose analysis, mean dose differences of D 99% for CTV, V 95% for PTV, Dmax for rectum and bladder, and 3D gamma analysis (local, 1%/1 mm) were calculated from CT and sCT. Furthermore, Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare the image and dose results obtained with the generic model to those with the other trained models. Results: Considering the image results for the entire pelvis, when the data used for the test comes from the same center as the data used for training, the results were not significantly different from the generic model. Absolute dose differences were less than 1 Gy for the CTV D 99% for every trained model and center. The gamma analysis results showed nonsignificant differences between the generic and monocentric models. Conclusion: The accuracy of sCT, in terms of image and dose, is equivalent to whether MRI images are generated using the generic model or the monocentric model. The generic model, using only eight MRI-CT pairs per center, offers robust sCT generation, facilitating PCa MRI-only radiotherapy for routine clinical use.

Determination of acceptable Hounsfield units uncertainties via a sensitivity analysis for an accurate dose calculation in the context of prostate MRI-only radiotherapy.

Radiation therapy is moving from CT based to MRI guided planning, particularly for soft tissue anatomy. An important requirement of this new workflow is the generation of synthetic-CT (sCT) from MRI to enable treatment dose calculations. Automatic methods to determine the acceptable range of CT Hounsfield Unit (HU) uncertainties to avoid dose distribution errors is thus a key step toward safe MRI-only radiotherapy. This work has analysed the effects of controlled errors introduced in CT scans on the delivered radiation dose for prostate cancer patients. Spearman correlation coefficient has been computed, and a global sensitivity analysis performed following the Morris screening method. This allows the classification of different error factors according to their impact on the dose at the isocentre. sCT HU estimation errors in the bladder appeared to be the least influential factor, and sCT quality assessment should not only focus on organs surrounding the radiation target, as errors in other soft tissue may significantly impact the dose in the target volume. This methodology links dose and intensity-based metrics, and is the first step to define a threshold of acceptability of HU uncertainties for accurate dose planning.

Contour-guided deep learning based deformable image registration for dose monitoring during CBCT-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate deep learning (DL)-based deformable image registration (DIR) for dose accumulation during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data including 341 CBCTs (209 daily, 132 weekly) and 23 planning CTs from 23 patients was retrospectively analyzed. Anatomical deformation during treatment was estimated using free-form deformation (FFD) method from Elastix and DL-based VoxelMorph approaches. The VoxelMorph method was investigated using anatomical scans (VMorph_Sc) or label images (VMorph_Msk), or the combination of both (VMorph_Sc_Msk). Accumulated doses were compared with the planning dose. RESULTS: The DSC ranges, averaged for prostate, rectum and bladder, were 0.60-0.71, 0.67-0.79, 0.93-0.98, and 0.89-0.96 for the FFD, VMorph_Sc, VMorph_Msk, and VMorph_Sc_Msk methods, respectively. When including both anatomical and label images, VoxelMorph estimated more complex deformations resulting in heterogeneous determinant of Jacobian and higher percentage of deformation vector field (DVF) folding (up to a mean value of 1.90% in the prostate). Large differences were observed between DL-based methods regarding estimation of the accumulated dose, showing systematic overdosage and underdosage of the bladder and rectum, respectively. The difference between planned mean dose and accumulated mean dose with VMorph_Sc_Msk reached a median value of +6.3 Gy for the bladder and -5.1 Gy for the rectum. CONCLUSION: The estimation of the deformations using DL-based approach is feasible for male pelvic anatomy but requires the inclusion of anatomical contours to improve organ correspondence. High variability in the estimation of the accumulated dose depending on the deformable strategy suggests further investigation of DL-based techniques before clinical deployment.

Practical and technical key challenges in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: The GORTEC point of view.

Anatomical variations occur during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT) treatment. These variations may result in underdosage to the target volume or overdosage to the organ at risk. Replanning during the treatment course can be triggered to overcome this issue. Due to technological, methodological and clinical evolutions, tools for adaptive RT (ART) are becoming increasingly sophisticated. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the key steps of an H&N ART workflow and tools from the point of view of a group of French-speaking medical physicists and physicians (from GORTEC). Focuses are made on image registration, segmentation, estimation of the delivered dose of the day, workflow and quality assurance for an implementation of H&N offline and online ART. Practical recommendations are given to assist physicians and medical physicists in a clinical workflow.

Automatic segmentation for plan-of-the-day selection in CBCT-guided adaptive radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

Objective.Plan-of-the-day (PoD) adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is based on a library of treatment plans, among which, at each treatment fraction, the PoD is selected using daily images. However, this strategy is limited by PoD selection uncertainties. This work aimed to propose and evaluate a workflow to automatically and quantitatively identify the PoD for cervix cancer ART based on daily CBCT images.Approach.The quantification was based on the segmentation of the main structures of interest in the CBCT images (clinical target volume [CTV], rectum, bladder, and bowel bag) using a deep learning model. Then, the PoD was selected from the treatment plan library according to the geometrical coverage of the CTV. For the evaluation, the resulting PoD was compared to the one obtained considering reference CBCT delineations.Main results.In experiments on a database of 23 patients with 272 CBCT images, the proposed method obtained an agreement between the reference PoD and the automatically identified PoD for 91.5% of treatment fractions (99.6% when considering a 5% margin on CTV coverage).Significance.The proposed automatic workflow automatically selected PoD for ART using deep-learning methods. The results showed the ability of the proposed process to identify the optimal PoD in a treatment plan library.

Quality assurance for MRI-only radiation therapy: A voxel-wise population-based methodology for image and dose assessment of synthetic CT generation methods.

The quality assurance of synthetic CT (sCT) is crucial for safe clinical transfer to an MRI-only radiotherapy planning workflow. The aim of this work is to propose a population-based process assessing local errors in the generation of sCTs and their impact on dose distribution. For the analysis to be anatomically meaningful, a customized interpatient registration method brought the population data to the same coordinate system. Then, the voxel-based process was applied on two sCT generation methods: a bulk-density method and a generative adversarial network. The CT and MRI pairs of 39 patients treated by radiotherapy for prostate cancer were used for sCT generation, and 26 of them with delineated structures were selected for analysis. Voxel-wise errors in sCT compared to CT were assessed for image intensities and dose calculation, and a population-based statistical test was applied to identify the regions where discrepancies were significant. The cumulative histograms of the mean absolute dose error per volume of tissue were computed to give a quantitative indication of the error for each generation method. Accurate interpatient registration was achieved, with mean Dice scores higher than 0.91 for all organs. The proposed method produces three-dimensional maps that precisely show the location of the major discrepancies for both sCT generation methods, highlighting the heterogeneity of image and dose errors for sCT generation methods from MRI across the pelvic anatomy. Hence, this method provides additional information that will assist with both sCT development and quality control for MRI-based planning radiotherapy.

Deep learning-based segmentation in prostate radiation therapy using Monte Carlo simulated cone-beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: Segmenting organs in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images would allow to adapt the radiotherapy based on the organ deformations that may occur between treatment fractions. However, this is a difficult task because of the relative lack of contrast in CBCT images, leading to high inter-observer variability. Deformable image registration (DIR) and deep-learning based automatic segmentation approaches have shown interesting results for this task in the past years. However, they are either sensitive to large organ deformations, or require to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) from a database of delineated CBCT images, which is difficult to do without improvement of image quality. In this work, we propose an alternative approach: to train a CNN (using a deep learning-based segmentation tool called nnU-Net) from a database of artificial CBCT images simulated from planning CT, for which it is easier to obtain the organ contours. METHODS: Pseudo-CBCT (pCBCT) images were simulated from readily available segmented planning CT images, using the GATE Monte Carlo simulation. CT reference delineations were copied onto the pCBCT, resulting in a database of segmented images used to train the neural network. The studied segmentation contours were: bladder, rectum, and prostate contours. We trained multiple nnU-Net models using different training: (1) segmented real CBCT, (2) pCBCT, (3) segmented real CT and tested on pseudo-CT (pCT) generated from CBCT with cycleGAN, and (4) a combination of (2) and (3). The evaluation was performed on different datasets of segmented CBCT or pCT by comparing predicted segmentations with reference ones thanks to Dice similarity score and Hausdorff distance. A qualitative evaluation was also performed to compare DIR-based and nnU-Net-based segmentations. RESULTS: Training with pCBCT was found to lead to comparable results to using real CBCT images. When evaluated on CBCT obtained from the same hospital as the CT images used in the simulation of the pCBCT, the model trained with pCBCT scored mean DSCs of 0.92 ± 0.05, 0.87 ± 0.02, and 0.85 ± 0.04 and mean Hausdorff distance 4.67 ± 3.01, 3.91 ± 0.98, and 5.00 ± 1.32 for the bladder, rectum, and prostate contours respectively, while the model trained with real CBCT scored mean DSCs of 0.91 ± 0.06, 0.83 ± 0.07, and 0.81 ± 0.05 and mean Hausdorff distance 5.62 ± 3.24, 6.43 ± 5.11, and 6.19 ± 1.14 for the bladder, rectum, and prostate contours, respectively. It was also found to outperform models using pCT or a combination of both, except for the prostate contour when tested on a dataset from a different hospital. Moreover, the resulting segmentations demonstrated a clinical acceptability, where 78% of bladder segmentations, 98% of rectum segmentations, and 93% of prostate segmentations required minor or no corrections, and for 76% of the patients, all structures of the patient required minor or no corrections. CONCLUSION: We proposed to use simulated CBCT images to train a nnU-Net segmentation model, avoiding the need to gather complex and time-consuming reference delineations on CBCT images.

Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.

Background: A rectal sub-region (SRR) has been previously identified by voxel-wise analysis in the inferior-anterior part of the rectum as highly predictive of rectal bleeding (RB) in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Translating the SRR to patient-specific radiotherapy planning is challenging as new constraints have to be defined. A recent geometry-based model proposed to optimize the planning by determining the achievable mean doses (AMDs) to the organs at risk (OARs), taking into account the overlap between the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR. The aim of this study was to quantify the SRR dose sparing by using the AMD model in the planning, while preserving the dose to the prostate. Material and Methods: Three-dimensional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning dose distributions for 60 patients were computed following four different strategies, delivering 78 Gy to the prostate, while meeting the genitourinary group dose constraints to the OAR: (i) a standard plan corresponding to the standard practice for rectum sparing (STDpl), (ii) a plan adding constraints to SRR (SRRpl), (iii) a plan using the AMD model applied to the rectum only (AMD_RECTpl), and (iv) a final plan using the AMD model applied to both the rectum and the SRR (AMD_RECT_SRRpl). After PTV dose normalization, plans were compared with regard to dose distributions, quality, and estimated risk of RB using a normal tissue complication probability model. Results: AMD_RECT_SRRpl showed the largest SRR dose sparing, with significant mean dose reductions of 7.7, 3, and 2.3 Gy, with respect to the STDpl, SRRpl, and AMD_RECTpl, respectively. AMD_RECT_SRRpl also decreased the mean rectal dose by 3.6 Gy relative to STDpl and by 3.3 Gy relative to SRRpl. The absolute risk of grade ≥1 RB decreased from 22.8% using STDpl planning to 17.6% using AMD_RECT_SRRpl considering SRR volume. AMD_RECT_SRRpl plans, however, showed slightly less dose homogeneity and significant increase of the number of monitor units, compared to the three other strategies. Conclusion: Compared to a standard prostate planning, applying dose constraints to a patient-specific SRR by using the achievable mean dose model decreased the mean dose by 7.7 Gy to the SRR and may decrease the relative risk of RB by 22%.

Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning.

PURPOSE: Anatomical variations occur during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy treatment. kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images can be used for daily dose monitoring to assess dose variations owing to anatomic changes. Deep learning methods (DLMs) have recently been proposed to generate pseudo-CT (pCT) from CBCT to perform dose calculation. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a DLM and to compare this method with three existing methods of dose calculation from CBCT in H&N cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: Forty-four patients received VMAT for H&N cancer (70-63-56 Gy). For each patient, reference CT (Bigbore, Philips) and CBCT images (XVI, Elekta) were acquired. The DLM was based on a generative adversarial network. The three compared methods were: (a) a method using a density to Hounsfield Unit (HU) relation from phantom CBCT image (HU-D curve method), (b) a water-air-bone density assignment method (DAM), and iii) a method using deformable image registration (DIR). The imaging endpoints were the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) of HU from pCT and reference CT (CTref ). The dosimetric endpoints were dose discrepancies and 3D gamma analyses (local, 2%/2 mm, 30% dose threshold). Dose discrepancies were defined as the mean absolute differences between DVHs calculated from the CTref and pCT of each method. RESULTS: In the entire body, the MAEs and MEs of the DLM, HU-D curve method, DAM, and DIR method were 82.4 and 17.1 HU, 266.6 and 208.9 HU, 113.2 and 14.2 HU, and 95.5 and -36.6 HU, respectively. The MAE obtained using the DLM differed significantly from those of other methods (Wilcoxon, P ≤ 0.05). The DLM dose discrepancies were 7 ± 8 cGy (maximum = 44 cGy) for the ipsilateral parotid gland Dmean and 5 ± 6 cGy (max = 26 cGy) for the contralateral parotid gland mean dose (Dmean ). For the parotid gland Dmean , no significant dose difference was observed between the DLM and other methods. The mean 3D gamma pass rate ± standard deviation was 98.1 ± 1.2%, 91.0 ± 5.3%, 97.9 ± 1.6%, and 98.8 ± 0.7% for the DLM, HU-D method, DAM, and DIR method, respectively. The gamma pass rates and mean gamma results of the HU-D curve method, DAM, and DIR method differed significantly from those of the DLM. CONCLUSIONS: For H&N radiotherapy, DIR method and DLM appears as the most appealing CBCT-based dose calculation methods among the four methods in terms of dose accuracy as well as calculation time. Using the DIR method or DLM with CBCT images enables dose monitoring in the parotid glands during the treatment course and may be used to trigger replanning.

Comparison of Deep Learning-Based and Patch-Based Methods for Pseudo-CT Generation in MRI-Based Prostate Dose Planning.

PURPOSE: Deep learning methods (DLMs) have recently been proposed to generate pseudo-CT (pCT) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based dose planning. This study aims to evaluate and compare DLMs (U-Net and generative adversarial network [GAN]) using various loss functions (L2, single-scale perceptual loss [PL], multiscale PL, weighted multiscale PL) and a patch-based method (PBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients received a volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer (78 Gy). T2-weighted MRIs were acquired in addition to planning CTs. The pCTs were generated from the MRIs using 7 configurations: 4 GANs (L2, single-scale PL, multiscale PL, weighted multiscale PL), 2 U-Net (L2 and single-scale PL), and the PBM. The imaging endpoints were mean absolute error and mean error, in Hounsfield units, between the reference CT (CTref) and the pCT. Dose uncertainties were quantified as mean absolute differences between the dose volume histograms (DVHs) calculated from the CTref and pCT obtained by each method. Three-dimensional gamma indexes were analyzed. RESULTS: Considering the image uncertainties in the whole pelvis, GAN L2 and U-Net L2 showed the lowest mean absolute error (≤34.4 Hounsfield units). The mean errors were not different than 0 (P ≤ .05). The PBM provided the highest uncertainties. Very few DVH points differed when comparing GAN L2 or U-Net L2 DVHs and CTref DVHs (P ≤ .05). Their dose uncertainties were ≤0.6% for the prostate planning target Volume V95%, ≤0.5% for the rectum V70Gy, and ≤0.1% for the bladder V50Gy. The PBM, U-Net PL, and GAN PL presented the highest systematic dose uncertainties. The gamma pass rates were >99% for all DLMs. The mean calculation time to generate 1 pCT was 15 s for the DLMs and 62 min for the PBM. CONCLUSIONS: Generating pCT for MRI dose planning with DLMs and PBM provided low-dose uncertainties. In particular, the GAN L2 and U-Net L2 provided the lowest dose uncertainties together with a low computation time.

Pseudo-CT Generation for MRI-Only Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: Comparison Among Patch-Based, Atlas-Based, and Bulk Density Methods.

PURPOSE: Methods have been recently developed to generate pseudo-computed tomography (pCT) for dose calculation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiation therapy. This study aimed to propose an original nonlocal mean patch-based method (PBM) and to compare this PBM to an atlas-based method (ABM) and to a bulk density method (BDM) for prostate MRI-only radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients received a volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. In addition to the planning computed tomography (CT) scans, T2-weighted MRI scans were acquired. pCTs were generated from MRIs using 3 methods: an original nonlocal mean PBM, ABM, and BDM. The PBM was performed using feature extraction and approximate nearest neighbor search in a training cohort. The PBM accuracy was evaluated in a validation cohort by using imaging and dosimetric endpoints. Imaging endpoints included mean absolute error and mean error between Hounsfield units of the pCT and the reference CT (CTref). Dosimetric endpoints were based on dose-volume histograms calculated from the CTref and the pCTs for various volumes of interest and on 3-dimensional gamma analyses. The PBM uncertainties were compared with those of the ABM and BDM. RESULTS: The mean absolute error and mean error obtained from the PBM were 41.1 and -1.1 Hounsfield units. The PBM dose-volume histogram differences were 0.7% for prostate planning target volume V95%, 0.5% for rectum V70Gy, and 0.2% for bladder V50Gy. Compared with ABM and BDM, PBM provided significantly lower dose uncertainties for the prostate planning target volume (70-78 Gy), the rectum (8.5-29 Gy, 40-48 Gy, and 61-73 Gy), and the bladder (12-78 Gy). The PBM mean gamma pass rate (99.5%) was significantly higher than that of ABM (94.9%) or BDM (96.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed PBM provides low uncertainties with dose planned on CTref. These uncertainties were smaller than those of ABM and BDM and are unlikely to be clinically significant.

CBCT-guided evolutive library for cervical adaptive IMRT.

PURPOSE: In the context of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC), this study proposed an original cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided "Evolutive library" and evaluated it against four other known radiotherapy (RT) strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 20 patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for LACC, three planning CTs [with empty (EB), intermediate (IB), and full (FB) bladder volumes], a CT scan at 20 Gy and bi-weekly CBCTs for 5 weeks were performed. Five RT strategies were simulated for each patient: "Standard RT" was based on one IB planning CT; "internal target volume (ITV)-based RT" was an ITV built from the three planning CTs; "RT with one mid-treatment replanning (MidTtReplan)" corresponded to the standard RT with a replanning at 20 Gy; "Pretreatment library ART" using a planning library based on the three planning CTs; and the "Evolutive library ART", which was the "Pretreatment library ART" strategy enriched by including some CBCT anatomies into the library when the daily clinical target volume (CTV) shape differed from the ones in the library. Two planning target volume (PTV) margins of 7 and 10 mm were evaluated. All the strategies were geometrically compared in terms of the percentage of coverage by the PTV, for the CTV and the organs at risk (OAR) delineated on the CBCT. Inadequate coverage of the CTV and OARs by the PTV was also assessed using deformable image registration. The cumulated dose distributions of each strategy were likewise estimated and compared for one patient. RESULTS: The "Evolutive library ART" strategy involved a number of added CBCTs: 0 for 55%; 1 for 30%; 2 for 5%; and 3 for 10% of patients. Compared with the other four, this strategy provided the highest CTV geometric coverage by the PTV, with a mean (min-max) coverage of 98.5% (96.4-100) for 10 mm margins and 96.2% (93.0-99.7) for 7 mm margins (P < 0.05). Moreover, this strategy significantly decreased the geometric coverage of the bowel. CTV undercoverage by PTV occurred in the anterior and superior uterine regions for all strategies. The dosimetric analysis at 7 mm similarly demonstrated that the "Evolutive library ART" increased the V42.75Gy of the CTV by 27%, 20%, 13%, and 28% compared with "Standard RT", "ITV-based RT", "MidTtReplan", and "Pretreatment library ART", respectively. The dose to the bowel was also decreased by the "Evolutive library ART" compared with that by the other strategies. CONCLUSION: The "Evolutive library ART" is a personalized ART strategy that comprises a pretreatment planning library of three CT scans, enriched for half of the patients by one to three per-treatment CBCTs. This original strategy increased both the CTV coverage and bowel sparing compared with all the other tested strategies and enables us to consider a PTV margin reduction.

Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations.

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify the most accurate combination of phantom and protocol for image value to density table (IVDT) on volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dose calculation based on kV-Cone-beam CT imaging, for head and neck (H&N) and pelvic localizations. METHODS: Three phantoms (Catphan(®)600, CIRS(®)062M (inner phantom for head and outer phantom for body), and TomoTherapy(®) "Cheese" phantom) were used to create IVDT curves of CBCT systems with two different CBCT protocols (Standard-dose Head and Standard Pelvis). Hounsfield Unit (HU) time stability and repeatability for a single On-Board-Imager (OBI) and compatibility of two distinct devices were assessed with Catphan(®)600. Images from the anthropomorphic phantom CIRS ATOM(®) for both CT and CBCT modalities were used for VMAT dose calculation from different IVDT curves. Dosimetric indices from CT and CBCT imaging were compared. RESULTS: IVDT curves from CBCT images were highly different depending on phantom used (up to 1000 HU for high densities) and protocol applied (up to 200 HU for high densities). HU time stability was verified over seven weeks. A maximum difference of 3% on the dose calculation indices studied was found between CT and CBCT VMAT dose calculation across the two localizations using appropriate IVDT curves. One IVDT curve per localization can be established with a bi-monthly verification of IVDT-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: The IVDT-CBCTCIRS-Head phantom with the Standard-dose Head protocol was the most accurate combination for dose calculation on H&N CBCT images. For pelvic localizations, the IVDT-CBCTCheese established with the Standard Pelvis protocol provided the best accuracy.